Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Zaentz

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 23, 1990No. A038989PublishedCited by 8 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RACANELLI, P. J.

This case concerns a community property dispute between Saul Zaentz (husband) and Lynda Zaentz (wife) over the financial rewards of husband’s role as producer of the Academy Award-winning movie “Amadeus.” The central issue relates to the trial court’s allocation of an additional $600,000 to the community as compensation for husband’s production and financial contributions to “Amadeus.”

Procedural History

On November 16, 1983, wife filed a petition for dissolution of the marriage. Thereafter, following his response, husband filed a motion to set the alternative valuation…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Nestle v. City of Santa MonicaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Pereira v. PereiraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. In Re Marriage of MixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. In Re Marriage of FonsteinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  5. In Re Marriage of ConnollyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re the Marriage of KilbourneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  2. In Re Marriage of BiddleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
  3. In Re Marriage of QuayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. Brooks v. Brooks (In re Brooks), California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  5. Marriage of Honer CA1/4California Court of Appeal · 2015

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API