Chambers v. Groome Transportation
District Court, M.D. Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
W. KEITH WATKINS, Chief Judge.
I.INTRODUCTION
■ Forty-five Plaintiffs bring this complaint against their former employer, alleging violations of the Workers’ Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act, 29 U.S.C. §§ 2101-09 (“WARN Act”) and the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-19. In lieu of an answer, Defendant Groome Transportation of Alabama, Inc. (“Groome Transportation”) filed a motion to compel arbitration. (Doc. #8.) Groome Transportation argues that an arbitration agreement and the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), 9 U.S.C. §§ 1-16 require…
2Cases cited54 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Cullman Sec. Servs., Inc. v. United Propane Gas, Inc. (Ex parte United Propane Gas, Inc.)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2018
- Banks v. Cashcall, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2016
- Amadasun v. Google, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2022
- Baker Construction Services, LLC v. Rabren General Contractors, Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2020
- Carmon D. Flynn v. Bridgecrest Credit Company, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2026
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.