Rogers v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
WOODLEY, Judge.
The offense is passing as true a forged instrument in writing; the punishment, enhanced under Art. 63 P.C. by two prior convictions for felonies less than capital, life.
There are two reasons why the judgment of conviction cannot be affirmed. ■(1) The indictment alleged that appellant was convicted of burglary in Victoria County on December 1, 1948, and that after the conviction had become final he committed the offense of theft, a felony, and on March 28, 1951, was convicted of that offense in Criminal District Court of Harris County, Texas.
We find no evidence in the record as…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Arbuckle v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Parasco v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1958
- Armendariz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956
- Guilliams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1953
3Cited by66 opinions
- Rummel v. EstelleSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Brooks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Hollins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
- Rogers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1960
- Tomlin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987
61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.