Legal Opinion

Jacklin Romeo et al. v. Antero Resources Corporation

District Court, N.D. West Virginia

Decided March 31, 2026No. 1:17-cv-00088Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF WEST VIRGINIA JACKLIN ROMEO et al., Plaintiffs, v. CIVIL NO. 1:17-CV-88 (KLEEH) ANTERO RESOURCES CORPORATION, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ON EACH OF DEFENDANT’S EIGHTEEN AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES [ECF NO. 437] Pending is the Class Members’ Motion for Summary Judgment on Each of Defendant’s Eighteen Affirmative Defenses [ECF No. 437]. For the reasons discussed herein, the motion is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. For good cause, the class…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Kristin D. Blair v. Defender Services, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
  5. Dan Ryan Builders, Inc. v. Crystal Ridge Development, Inc.West Virginia Supreme Court · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API