Legal Opinion

Haller Baking Co. v. Rochester Borough

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 17, 1935No. Appeal, 116PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Stadtfeld, J.,

This is a bill in equity to restrain defendant, a mu nicipal corporation, from the enforcement, by information and arrest, of the provisions of Section “E” of its ordinance No. 505, amending ordinance No. 493. The original ordinance, adopted and approved November 20, 1928, is entitled: “An ordinance of the Borough of Rochester, County of Beaver and State of Pennsylvania, regulating, taxing, licensing, and prohibiting certain matters, persons, places, and things legally subject thereto.”

Section “E” of the amendatory ordinance No. 505, approved December 30, 1933, reads:…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lawton v. SteeleSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Truax v. CorriganSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Coppage v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  4. White's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. Walls v. Midland Carbon Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1920

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Olan Mills, Inc. v. SharonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  2. Wynnewood Civic Ass'n v. Lower Merion TownshipSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  3. City of Mt. Sterling v. Donaldson Baking Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1941
  4. Rock v. PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. State v. AmickCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1937

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API