Legal Opinion

Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Co. v. Purcell Safe Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1916No. 13468PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Dykeman, J., entered September 1, 1915, in favor of the defendant on remittitur from the supreme court dismissing consolidated actions for replevin and on an account stated.

1Opinion of the CourtEllis, J.

This is an appeal by plaintiff from a judgment entered on the remittitur pursuant to our decision in a former appeal by the defendant in the same case. The original decision by Department One is reported in 81 Wash. 592, 142 Pac. 1153. Originally plaintiff brought two actions, the first in replevin, the second on account stated. The actions were consolidated and defendant answered, setting up a contract between the parties out of which the whole controversy arose, and pleading two counterclaims in large sums. The trial court found in favor of plaintiff on its complaints and against defendant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Washington National Building, Loan & Investment Ass'n v. SaundersWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Herring-Hall-Marvin Safe Co. v. Purcell Safe Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Gray v. GrangerWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Curry v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  5. McKee v. McKeeWashington Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bourne v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1944

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API