Legal Opinion
United States v. Herlong
District Court, W.D. South Carolina
Decided July 7, 1949No. Civ. A. No. 967PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WYCHE, Chief Judge.
This case is now before me upon plaintiff’s motion to re-tax the costs taxed by the Clerk on June 1, 1949, by adding thereto an attorney’s docket fee in the amount of $20.
The plaintiff brought this action against the defendant to recover the balance due upon a promissory note. The summons and complaint were served upon the defendant on May 4, 1949. On May 27, 1949, the Assistant United States Attorney filed an affidavit stating that the defendant had failed to file answer, motion or appearance of any kind, and that the time for so doing had not been extended; that the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Andrews v. ColeU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York · 1884
- Peerless Light Co. v. LevitonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1916
3Cited by9 opinions
- Combs v. Coal & Mineral Management Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1984
- Lundahl v. ZimmerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Alli v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
- Weaver v. Travel Inn, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1977
- Moyer v. Koloseik (In Re Sutton)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 2012
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.