Legal Opinion

People v. Rogers

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 17, 1931No. Docket No. 2029PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

It is provided by statute that “Every person who within the State of California . . . possesses any instrument or weapon of the kind commonly known as a blackjack, slungshot, billy, sandclub, sandbag or metal knuckles . . . shall be guilty of- a felony. ...” (Stats. 1923, p. 695; Deering’s General Laws (1925-1927 Supp.), Act 1970.) The foregoing quotation, which is from section 1 of the act as amended by Statutes of 1925, page 542, specifies certain exceptions of police and other officers from the operation of the act, in relation to the carrying of a wooden club, baton or other authorized…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. WardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. People v. BoothCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  3. People v. SoederCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. A. F. Estabrook Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Rebstock v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. BraunCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. People v. BlackCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  3. State v. BlevinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  4. People v. FryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. People v. SturdyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API