McDowell v. Perkinelmer Las, Inc.
District Court, M.D. Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
RULING
POLOZOLA, Chief Judge.
This matter is before the Court on James F. McDowell’s motion to remand. 1 PerkinElmer LAS, Inc. (“PerkinElmer”) has filed an opposition to plaintiffs motion. 2 The Court heard oral argument on the motion on April 28, 2005. After considering the arguments of counsel and conducting independent research on the issue, the Court feels compelled by Fifth Circuit precedent to deny the motion to remand despite the very persuasive language in the two district court cases relied on by the plaintiff. 3
I. Procedural Background
James McDowell filed this suit in the 19th…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Hanna v. PlumerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- County of Allegheny v. Frank Mashuda Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Trbovich v. United Mine WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Smith v. Amedisys Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
- Madisonville Traction Company v. Saint Bernard Mining CompanySupreme Court of the United States · 1905
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Gomez v. Biomet 3i, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2021
- Richards Clearview, L.L.C. v. Bed Bath & Beyond Inc.District Court, E.D. Louisiana · 2020