Harsay v. University of Kansas
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by Beier, J.:
After being denied promotion and tenure at the University of Kansas, Edina Harsay brought this action under the Kansas Judicial Review Act. The district judge dismissed the action for lack of prosecution. Harsay then refiled within six months, relying on K.S.A. 60-518, the savings statute, to make her action timely.
A panel of our Court of Appeals reversed the dismissal, ordering remand to the University to begin the promotion and tenure consideration process anew. The University has successfully petitioned for our review of whether K.S.A.…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Stechschulte v. JenningsSupreme Court of Kansas · 2013
- Pieren-Abbott v. Kansas Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Kansas · 2005
- Neighbor v. Westar Energy, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2015
- Mid-Continent Specialists, Inc. v. Capital Homes, L.C.Supreme Court of Kansas · 2005
- State v. SharpSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021
- Abraham v. Mercedes-Benz USA LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2025
- Ast v. MeskerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
- Espinoza v. Kansas Dept. of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2020
- Gilliam v. Kansas State Fair Bd.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.