Legal Opinion

McFadden v. Elma Country Club

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided May 23, 1980No. 3395-IIPublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pearson, A.C.J.

—Suzanne McFadden and Patrick Sloan appeal from an order granting summary judgment to the Elma Country Club. The only issue before this court is whether the respondent country club discriminated against McFadden on the basis of her sex or marital status in violation of RCW 49.60.222 when she was denied membership in the country club. After reviewing the history and purpose of RCW 49.60, we hold the trial court properly determined, as a matter of law, that there was no violation of RCW 49.60.222 by respondents.

McFadden and Sloan lived together in Tacoma for 2 years before July…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Hearst Corp. v. HoppeWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Phillips v. Martin Marietta Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Ohler v. Tacoma General HospitalWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Washington Water Power Co. v. Washington State Human Rights CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Adamski v. Tacoma General HospitalCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Kastanis v. Educational Employees Credit UnionWashington Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Smith v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Davis v. Department of Employment SecurityWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Foreman v. Anchorage Equal Rights CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. North Dakota Fair Housing Council, Inc. v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API