Legal Opinion

Cheng v. Cordell

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided October 31, 1989PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBlack, P.J.

This appeal arises out of the court's dismissal of defendant's draft report as untimely pursuant to Dist./Mun. Cts., R. Civ. P., Rule 64(C) (1) (i) which states that such reports must be filed within ten days after entry of judgment. The trial court may extend ten additional days upon a showing of excusable neglect. The question arises in this case as to when the trial court in fact entered judgment.

A portion of the docket entries are significant to an understanding of the issues presented:

Feb. 10,1989, Judgment for Plffs against Deft, on Counts I and II.

Mar. 1,1989, Deft, files motion to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lewis v. EmersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1984
  2. Almeida Bus Lines, Inc. v. Department of Public UtilitiesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1965
  3. Perkins v. PerkinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
  4. Brown v. QuinnMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
  5. Chittenden Trust Co. v. LevittMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bronstein v. LueckMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API