Container Co. v. Carpenter Container Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
RODNEY, District Judge.
The question here is whether a jury trial should be ordered by the court upon a motion therefor by the defendant when no timely demand therefor has been made.
This action was instituted under the Federal Declaratory Judgments Act1 for a declaratory judgment of the non-infringement by plaintiff and the invalidity of Patent No. 2,382,858 owned by defendant. Defendant’s amended answer contains a counterclaim made up of two separate claims or causes of action. The first claim in the counterclaim is a treble damage suit -based upon the anti-trust laws of the United States 2…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Aetna Insurance v. Kennedy Ex Rel. BogashSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Ring v. SpinaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Bereslavsky v. KloebCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
- Kass v. BaskinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1947
- William Goldman Theatres, Inc. v. KirkpatrickCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ohlinger v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1955
- Reeves v. Pennsylvania R.District Court, D. Delaware · 1949
- Arrington v. McCartyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
- New Hampshire Fire Insurance v. PerkinsDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1961
- Protexol Corp. v. Koppers Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1951
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.