Legal Opinion

United States v. Paulk

United States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals

Decided May 20, 2008No. ACM 36952Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SOYBEL, Judge:

In accordance with his pleas, the appellant was convicted of failure to obey a lawful regulation by transmitting, sending or storing offensive material on a government-owned computer, making a false official statement to his squadron commander that his relationship with MK, the wife of another officer, was not intimate or sexual in nature and that they had not had sex, and for having intercourse with MK, a married woman, not his wife, in violation of Articles 92, 107, and 134, UCMJ, 10 U.S.C. §§ 892, 907, and 934. *642He was found not guilty of disobeying a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Romer v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. United States v. Carolene Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  4. Lehnhausen v. Lake Shore Auto Parts Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. United States v. SnellingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API