Legal Opinion

(PC) Adams v. Dahl

District Court, E.D. California

Decided November 4, 2022No. 1:20-cv-00852Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 PAUL ADAMS, Case No. 1:20-cv-00852-CDB (PC) 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO 12 v. DENY DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO REVOKE PLAINTIFF’S IN FORMA PAUPERIS STATUS 13 DAHL, et al., (ECF No. 32) 14 Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY PLAINTIFF’S EMERGENCY 15 APPLICATION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER (ECF No. 26) 16 FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE 17 18 ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE (ECF No. 32-1) 19 Clerk of Court to assign a district judge. 20 21 I. BACKGROUND 22…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API