Legal Opinion

State v. La Fernier

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 28, 1969No. State 61PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor T. Hansen, J.

This ease concerns the application of sec. 885.31, Stats. 2 The application of this statute and the use or effect of the statute in criminal cases is directly related to the confrontation clause of both the United States Constitution 3 and the Wisconsin Constitution. 4

The state contends that the requirements of Sec. 885.31, Stats., were met in the instant case since all that must be shown is that the witness is absent from the state, and when that showing is made, the trial court has no discretion to exercise concerning the admission.

The defendant argues that the state must show that the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Barber v. PageSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Inda v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Philbrook v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BohannonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  2. State v. OlsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  3. La Barge v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State v. BurnsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State v. LindseyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API