Legal Opinion

Washington Statewide Organization of Stepparents v. Smith

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 1975No. 43188PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.

In this class action, the appellants ask the court to hold that the provisions of RCW 26.16.205 and *56526.20.0301 do not apply to those members of the class who were married prior to 1969 when these statutes were amended to impose a duty of support upon stepparents; and a further holding that in any event the statutes are unconstitutional because public assistance regulations promulgated pursuant to them deny equal protection of the laws to the members of the class.2 The trial court, after hearing and entering findings of fact and conclusions of law, dismissed the action with prejudice. We agreed…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Maynard v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Lewis v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. In Re the Estate of BordeauxWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Matter of Kane v. NecciNew York Court of Appeals · 1935

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Hunter v. North Mason School Dist.Washington Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Harmon v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Harmon v. DEPT. OF SOCIAL & HEALTH SERV.Washington Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Andersen v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. KentWashington Supreme Court · 1976

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API