Legal Opinion
Paterson Tallow Co. v. Royal Globe Insurance Companies
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided April 19, 1982PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
CLIFFORD, J.
This appeal questions the rights and obligations of the parties under an insurance contract. The insured, Paterson Tallow Co., Inc. (Paterson Tallow), contends that defendants Royal Globe Insurance Companies (Royal Globe) and its subsidiary Newark Insurance Company (Newark) were obligated to defend a malicious prosecution suit brought against them by a former employee. Defendant Newark issued the insurance policy after commencement but before completion of certain criminal proceedings instituted by Paterson Tallow against the former…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lind v. SchmidSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- Earl v. WinneSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1953
- Muller Fuel Oil Co. v. Ins. Co. of N. Amer.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
- The Penwag Property Co., Inc. v. LandauSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
- S. Freedman & Sons, Inc. v. Hartford Fire InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Brunson v. Affinity Federal Credit UnionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2009
- Billings v. COMMERCE INSURANCE COMPANYMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2010
- City Of Erie, Pennsylvania v. Guaranty National Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
- First Newton National Bank v. General Casualty Co. of WisconsinSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
- Berman v. KarvounisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.