Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Warner v. District Court

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided August 10, 1923No. 23,660PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This is an original proceeding, and is now before us on an order to show cause why a peremptory writ of -mandamus should not issue to the district court of Mahnomen county, requiring the remanding to the county of Beltrami of an action under the Federal Employers Liability Act, wherein the relator is plaintiff and the Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Company is defendant. For convenience the relator will be referred to as plaintiff and the railway company as defendant. The plaintiff resides in Mahnomen county. While employed there by defendant in interstate commerce he…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  2. Castle v. Village of BaudetteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  3. Doll v. Chicago Great Western RailroadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  4. Thon v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  5. United States v. Scott Faul, United States of America v. Yorie Von Kahl, United States of America v. David Ronald Broer A/K/A David Ronald BrewerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API