Legal Opinion

Thon v. Erickson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 29, 1950No. 35,459PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Justice.

Application by plaintiff, by order to show cause, for peremptory writ of mandamus to compel the district court of Hennepin county to retain for trial an action based on fraudulent representations in the sale of a theater located in Lincoln county.

Plaintiff, who resides at Hendricks in Lincoln county, brought ap action in Hennepin county against defendant, who resides at Sioux *324Falls, South Dakota. The action is based on fraudulent representations in the sale by defendant to plaintiff of a theater at Hendricks, a village which is located about 12 miles from Ivanhoe, the county…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nye v. SwanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1889
  2. Sheldon v. RisedorphSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1877
  3. Gillette-Herzog Manufacturing Co. v. AshtonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1893
  4. State ex rel. Warner v. District CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  5. Vornbrock v. BolligSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Guastello v. Citizens Mutual InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Thies v. Midland Co-Operative Wholesale, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
  3. Fara v. Great Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  4. Swenson v. SwensonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  5. Continental Casualty Co. v. 3M Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API