Legal Opinion

Sommerness v. QUADNA RESORT SERVICES

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 8, 1987No. C0-87-1186PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FORSBERG, Judge.

Respondent William D. Sommerness, as trustee for the next of kin and the surviving spouse of Thomas Michael Sommerness, brought this dram shop action against appellant Quadna Resort Services, individually and d.b.a. Chalet Bar and Loft Bar (“Quadna”), and respondent Herb Stansberry, individually and d.b.a. Corner Club (“Corner Club”). Quadna then attempted to implead respondent Sportsman’s Bar (“Sportsman’s”) as a third party defendant, seeking to obtain contribution from Sportsman’s in the event Quadna was found liable. Because the deceased Thomas Sommerness owned…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ross v. RossSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  2. Ascheman v. Village of HancockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
  3. Conde v. City of Spring Lake ParkSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. v. ToddSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  2. Ohio Casualty Insurance Co. v. ToddSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1991
  3. Sommerness v. QUADNA RESORT SERVICESCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API