Legal Opinion

Larson v. City of Ottawa

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 7, 1917No. 21,307PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from Franklin district court; Charles A. Smart, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*423The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, C. J.:

This was an action brought by Eph Larson and Matt Sweet against the city of Ottawa to determine the validity of an assessment, to pay for the paving of Ash street in that city between Sixth and Seventh streets. The case was submitted upon an agreed statement of facts from which the trial court determined that the assessment as made by the city was improper and should be enjoined. The following plat shows the location of the district in question:

Baldwin & Taylor’s addition was platted when the west line of the city limits was Ash street,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Ottawa v. BarneySupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  2. Bowlus v. City of IolaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  3. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. City of ChanuteSupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  4. McGrew v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
  5. Blair v. City of AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bell v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  2. Bush v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  3. Wilson v. City of TopekaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949
  4. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. City of EllinwoodSupreme Court of Kansas · 1925
  5. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. City of KingmanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1927

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API