Legal Opinion

People v. Bolden

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 4, 1979No. Crim. 11126PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT. *

Samuel Othello Bolden, Jr., appeals the order finding him mentally incompetent to stand trial based upon a jury verdict of incompetence. Bolden contends he was denied due process by Penal Code section 1368 which requires his attorney to give an opinion of his client’s competence, and was denied effective assistance of counsel when his counsel offered evidence of his incompetence although Bolden desired to be found competent.

Bolden was charged with robbery (Pen. Code, § 211), two counts of assault with intent to murder (Pen. Code, § 217), and two counts of assault with a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People v. PopeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. People v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  3. People v. MerkourisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
  4. People v. GilbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Grand Lake Drive In, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  2. People v. BlacksherCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  3. People v. MickleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. People v. MastersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  5. DeFusco v. GiorgioSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1982

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API