People v. Bolden
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
THE COURT. *
Samuel Othello Bolden, Jr., appeals the order finding him mentally incompetent to stand trial based upon a jury verdict of incompetence. Bolden contends he was denied due process by Penal Code section 1368 which requires his attorney to give an opinion of his client’s competence, and was denied effective assistance of counsel when his counsel offered evidence of his incompetence although Bolden desired to be found competent.
Bolden was charged with robbery (Pen. Code, § 211), two counts of assault with intent to murder (Pen. Code, § 217), and two counts of assault with a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- People v. PopeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. MerkourisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- People v. GilbertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Grand Lake Drive In, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
3Cited by19 opinions
- People v. StanleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- People v. BlacksherCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- People v. MickleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- People v. MastersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- DeFusco v. GiorgioSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1982
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.