Legal Opinion

Koerner v. Associated Linen Laundry Suppliers, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 14, 1946PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

We think the Appellate Term correctly determined that defendant was not a service establishment within the exemption of clause (2) of subdivision (a) of section 13 of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938 (U. S. Code, tit. 29, § 213, subd. [a], cl. [2]) and was engaged in an occupation necessary to the production of goods for commerce within the meaning of subdivision (j) of section 3 of the Act (U. S. Code, tit. 29, § 203, subd. [j]).

Subdivision (b) of section 16 of the Act (U. S. Code, tit. 29, § 216, subd. [b]) provides that the court, in addition to any judgment awarded the employee, shall…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Randall v. . PackardNew York Court of Appeals · 1894
  2. Koerner v. Associated Linen Laundry Suppliers, Inc.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1945

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nitti v. Credit Bureau of Rochester, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Knapp v. McFarlandDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
  3. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ClacherNew York Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API