Legal Opinion

State v. Williams

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 14, 2013No. 08CR0707; A145644PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNakamoto, J.

Defendant was convicted after a jury trial of two counts of first-degree sexual abuse, ORS 163.427, for his conduct involving a five-year-old girl. The state was required to prove that defendant touched or attempted to touch the child’s sexual or other intimate parts “for the purpose of arousing or gratifying the sexual desire of’ either party. ORS 163.427(l)(b); ORS 163.305(6) (defining sexual contact). On appeal, defendant advances four assignments of error. He contends that the trial court erred in (1) admitting evidence that he possessed two pairs of little girls underwear as relevant to…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  2. State v. JohnsOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  3. State v. TitusOregon Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. JohnsonOregon Supreme Court · 2006
  5. State v. PittOregon Supreme Court · 2012

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. BrumbachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  4. State v. GoffCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
  5. State v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API