Legal Opinion
W. E. Herron Motor Co. v. Maynor
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided April 30, 1936No. 6 Div. 668PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, Justice.
The complaint is in two counts for trover.
The evidence being closed, the “defend•ants made a motion to exclude the testimony, and over the protest of the plaintiff the motion was granted, to which the plaintiff then and there excepted, and thereupon the court discharged the jury and entered up a judgment in favor of the defendants, to which the plaintiff then and there duly reserved an exception.”
The granting of the motion to exclude the evidence was without injury, for the evidence did not make a prima facie case. Dorough v. Alabama Great Southern R. Co., 221 Ala. 305, 128…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Booker v. JonesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
- Dorough v. Alabama Great Southern R. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Blackman v. Lehman, Durr & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1879
- Lowremore v. BerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1851
- Mount Vernon-Woodberry Mills v. LittleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1931
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Carter v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
- Tarrant American Savings Bank v. Smokeless Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Sharpe v. Western Ry. of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Williams v. Prudential Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Carter v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1955
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.