Legal Opinion

Hutton v. Pederson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 4, 1913PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from District Court, Dallam County; D. B. Hill, Judge. Action by P. M. Pederson and another against R. P. Hutton and others. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtHaul, J.

On March 21, 1906, defendant in error Pederson executed and delivered to M. Willis his promissory note for $197.66, providing for interest and attorney’s fees, payable at Dalhart, Tex., nine months after date, and on the same day executed and delivered to R. P. Hutton, as trustee, a deed in trust of certain real estate, situated in the town of Dalhart, to secure the payment of said note. Thereafter M. Willis died, and T. J. Willis, one of the plaintiffs in error, was appointed and qualified as administrator of the estate. On August 12, 1911, R. P. Hutton, as trustee, advertised the lots for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Conner v. HollandTexas Commission of Appeals · 1882

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Barrera v. GonzalezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1960
  2. City Nat. Bank of Commerce v. FarringtonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Mensing v. Fidelity Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. Ezell v. FowlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  5. Finley v. ThorneSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API