Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Ramjay Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided December 20, 2023No. Civil Action No. 2022-0931Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LAFONDA CUNNINGHAM, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 22-931(BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell RAMJAY INC., SHASTHRA USA INC., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Lafonda Cunningham filed this action against defendants Ramjay, Inc. (“Ramjay”) and Shasthra USA Inc. (“Shasthra”), alleging that she was subject to a hostile work environment and retaliation based on her sex, in violation of the District of Columbia Human Rights Act (“DCHRA”),

D.C. Code § 2-1401.01

et seq. Second Am. Compl. ¶¶ 25–30, ECF No. 35. Defendants have moved for summary…

2Cases cited37 opinions

Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.