Legal Opinion
Carr v. Board of Trustees of Maine State Retirement System
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided June 7, 1994PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RUDMAN, Justice.
The Board of Trustees of the Maine State Retirement System (the “Board”) and the City of Portland appeal from the judgment entered in the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Chandler, J.) vacating a decision of the Board. When Carr applied for disability retirement benefits, the Board interpreted the applicable disability retirement statute 1 to require that the evaluation of Carr’s disability to perform his job be based on the job he was performing at the time of his application for benefits rather than the job he was performing when he was originally injured. 5 M.R.S.A. § 1122…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Imagineering, Inc. v. Superintendent of InsuranceSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1991
- Robinson v. Board of Trustees of the Maine State Retirement SystemSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
- Dishon v. Maine State Retirement SystemSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
- Porter v. Maine State Retirement SystemSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
- State v. LeonardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1984
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kelley v. Maine Public Employees Retirement SystemSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2009
- State of Maine v. Andrew J. LegassieSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
- Richardson v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
- Chase v. City of PortlandSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995