Dambacher by Dambacher v. Mallis
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWieand, Judge
A jury found that Sears, Roebuck & Company (Sears) had marketed a defective, steel-belted, radial tire because it failed to imprint on the wall of the tire a warning against using it in conjunction with non-radial tires. On appeal from a judgment entered on the verdict, Sears contends (1) that the adequacy of the warning was submitted to the jury improperly and on inadequate instructions; (2) that the trial court erred in permitting opinion testimony from witnesses who were not properly qualified as experts; (3) that the trial court erred in several evidentiary rulings; and (4) that the court…
2Cases cited109 opinions
- Barker v. Lull Engineering Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
- Webb v. ZernSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Clarence Borel v. Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Nationalsurety Corporation, Intervenor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
- Voss v. Black & Decker Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1983
- Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
104 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.