Legal Opinion

Welchel v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 28, 2002No. A02A0904PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Miller, Judge.

Having reason to suspect the presence of contraband in a motel room occupied by defendant, police used a key from the motel office to enter the room, where they found defendant with illegal drugs. The question on appeal is whether exigent circumstances justified the warrantless, nonconsensual entry into the motel room. Since prior to entry police had no reason to suspect defendant was about to destroy or conceal the drugs, we hold that no evidence supported a finding of exigency and that therefore the trial court erred in denying defendant’s motion to suppress the seized…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Welsh v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Steagald v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Tate v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1994
  5. United States v. Shy Heath (99-6550) and Carmen Horton (99-6549)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Brown v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  2. State v. SchwartzCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  3. Snider v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  4. Hicks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  5. State v. FulghumCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API