State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Mashburn
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the CourtBrowning, J.
The trial court erred in entering summary judgment and we accordingly reverse. We remand for further proceedings for the reasons in this opinion.
In this insurance coverage case, Appel-lee Joyce Mashburn sought, and received, summary judgment by arguing she “is” eligible for medical expenses coverage under the terms of the policy issued by Appellant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance. Here on appeal, State Farm vigorously disputed that she is so eligible, and while Mashburn gamely defended the trial court’s decision, she basically argued to this court that she “should” have been covered…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Auto-Owners Ins. Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
- Swire Pacific Holdings, Inc. v. Zurich Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2003
- State Farm Fire & Cas. v. CTC DEVELOPMENTSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
- General Star Indem. Co. v. W. Fla. Village Inn, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
- Williams v. Bank of America Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Southern-Owners Insurance Co. v. Easdon Rhodes & Associates LLCCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017
- Universal Property & Casualty Insurance Co. v. JohnsonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Shelithea Hallums v. Infinity Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- Certain Interested Underwriters at Lloyd's London v. Pitu, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2012
- Gee v. U.S. Bank National Ass'nDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.