Legal Opinion

City of Indianapolis v. Holt

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided July 10, 1900No. 19,391PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDowling, J.

— In this suit, the validity of the statute relating to the improvement of streets in cities in Indiana, having a population of 100,000 or more is assailed, on the ground that it violates the provisions of articles five and fourteen of the federal Constitution, and section twenty-one of the Bill of Rights of the Constitution of the State of *223Indiana, by authorizing the taking of private property for public use without due process of law, and without just compensation therefor.

The action was brought by the appellee against the city of Indianapolis,' and its board of public works, to enjoin the…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Davidson v. New OrleansSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Hagar v. Reclamation District No. 108Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  4. Norwood v. BakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  5. Stuart v. . PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1878

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Foltz, Van Camp Hdw., Etc. v. City of Indpls.Indiana Supreme Court · 1955
  2. City of Kinston v. WootenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
  3. Curless v. WatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Boyce v. TuheyIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Martin v. WillsIndiana Supreme Court · 1901

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API