Legal Opinion
Soussa v. Denville Tp. Planning Bd.
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 23, 1990PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
238 N.J. Super. 66 (1990)
568 A.2d 1225
MAURICE SOUSSA AND ESTHER SOUSSA, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,
v.
DENVILLE TOWNSHIP PLANNING BOARD, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued December 12, 1989.
Decided January 23, 1990.
Before Judges PRESSLER, LONG and LANDAU.
Allen Hantman argued the cause for appellants (Morris and Hantman, attorneys).
Joel Murphy argued the cause for respondent (Murphy and Kurnos, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was delivered by LONG, J.A.D.
In 1977, plaintiffs Maurice and Esther Soussa, property owners in the Township of Denville, submitted…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Russell v. Tenafly Bd. of AdjustmentSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1959
- Allied Realty, Ltd. v. Borough of Upper Saddle RiverNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
- Leasehold Estates, Inc. v. Fulbro Holding Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
- Roehrs v. LeesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
- City of Paterson v. SchneiderNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
3Cited by4 opinions
- Aldrich v. SchwartzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1992
- Assisted Living Associates of Moorestown, L.L.C. v. Moorestown TownshipDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
- American Dream At Marlboro, L.L.C. v. Planning BoardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2012
- SERGIO MARTINS VS. TOWNSHIP OF CRANFORD (C-000141-18, UNION COUNTY AND STATEWIDENew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2020