Legal Opinion

Tricentrol Oil Trading, Inc. v. Annesley

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 5, 1991No. D-0420PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

Tricentrol Oil Trading, Inc. (TOTI) and Tricentrol Overseas, Ltd. (TOSL), petitioners, filed suit against Margaret I. Annesley and Gale H. Touchstone, respondents, to recover two seats on the New York Mercantile Exchange (NYMEX). A jury returned a verdict for petitioners on all theories of recovery and awarded damages to petitioners for conversion, breach of fiduciary duty, breach of contract, punitive damages, and attorney’s fees. In conformance with the jury verdict, the trial court decreed that TOTI was the legal owner and holder of all right, title and interest in the exchange seats in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nolana Development Ass'n v. CorsiTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Cohrs v. ScottTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Groves v. HanksCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  4. Uriarte v. PetroCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1980
  5. Houston Oilers, Inc. v. FloydCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Hubbard v. ShankleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2004
  2. Boales v. Brighton Builders, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2000
  3. Grimes v. Andrews, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1999
  4. Tricentrol Overseas, Ltd. v. Touchstone (In Re Touchstone)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Florida. · 1993
  5. Equitable Recovery, L.P. v. Heath Insurance Brokers of Texas, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2007

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API