State v. Armstrong
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court 1
OPINION
2Opinion of the Court · AndersonE. Riley Anderson, J.
in which FRANK F. DROWOTA, III, C.J., and ADOLPHO A. BIRCH, JR., JANICE M. HOLDER, and WILLIAM M. BARKER, JJ„ joined.
We granted this appeal to determine whether a trial court’s entry of an order of correction filed after the entry of the final judgment satisfied the requirements for the defendant to appeal a certified question of law pursuant to Rule 37(b)(2) of the Tennessee Rules of Criminal Procedure. The Court of Criminal Appeals concluded that neither the order nor the final judgment met the requirements for appealing a certified question of law set forth in State v. Preston, 759…
3Cases cited4 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- State v. PendergrassTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. PrestonTennessee Supreme Court · 1988
- State v. IrwinTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
4Cited by103 opinions
- David CANTRELL v. Joe EASTERLING, WardenTennessee Supreme Court · 2011
- State of Tennessee v. Michael Shane SpringerTennessee Supreme Court · 2013
- Born Again Church & Christian Outreach Ministries, Inc. v. Myler Church Building Systems of the Midsouth, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2007
- State of Tennessee v. David NageleTennessee Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. BoweryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2004
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.