Legal Opinion

Foster v. Foster

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided April 18, 1978No. 38388PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DOWD, Presiding Judge.

In this will contest action, the trial court dismissed plaintiff’s petition because of plaintiff’s failure to obtain service on a necessary party-defendant for a period over 26 months, when the statute required service within 90 days. The Court found that the plaintiff failed to show “good cause” in • not fulfilling the statutory requirement. Plaintiff appeals. We affirm.

The statute governing this case is Section 473.083(4) RSMo 1969 which sets out the procedure in will contest actions and provides:

“4. In any such action the petitioner shall proceed diligently to secure…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Randles v. SchaffnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
  2. Blatt v. HaileSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  3. Cole v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  4. Kane v. Mercantile Trust Co. National AssociationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
  5. Bash v. TrumanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Shaffer v. CochenourMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Howard v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
  3. Estate of Johnson v. PowellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  4. Epperson v. SheldonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Garrett v. MowryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API