Foster v. Foster
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
DOWD, Presiding Judge.
In this will contest action, the trial court dismissed plaintiff’s petition because of plaintiff’s failure to obtain service on a necessary party-defendant for a period over 26 months, when the statute required service within 90 days. The Court found that the plaintiff failed to show “good cause” in • not fulfilling the statutory requirement. Plaintiff appeals. We affirm.
The statute governing this case is Section 473.083(4) RSMo 1969 which sets out the procedure in will contest actions and provides:
“4. In any such action the petitioner shall proceed diligently to secure…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Randles v. SchaffnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1972
- Blatt v. HaileSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Cole v. SmithSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
- Kane v. Mercantile Trust Co. National AssociationSupreme Court of Missouri · 1974
- Bash v. TrumanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Shaffer v. CochenourMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
- Howard v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- Estate of Johnson v. PowellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1986
- Epperson v. SheldonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1987
- Garrett v. MowryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.