Legal Opinion

Kluge v. O'Gara

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 14, 1964No. Civ. 21445PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDbapeb, P. J.

This action arises out of an earlier malpractice suit against an attorney, which in turn was based upon dismissal of a still earlier action. Plaintiffs successively employed some eight attorneys to assert their original claims. In 1950, one attorney filed an action for plaintiffs, and in 1953 withdrew therefrom. The eighth attorney was employed, but failed to bring the case to trial. In 1958, the action was dismissed for lack of prosecution. Plaintiffs then sued the eighth attorney for malpractice, praying for $20,000 actual damages, and for exemplary damages. It is conceded that plaintiffs…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Finney v. LockhartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Clark v. McClurgCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Mother Cobb's Chicken Turnovers, Inc. v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Sterling Drug, Inc. v. BenatarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Haydel v. MortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Neal v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Leardi v. BrownMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
  3. Tri-Tron International, a Montana Corporation v. A. A. Velto and William Wurz, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
  4. O'NEIL v. SpillaneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975
  5. Shell Oil Co. v. ParkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API