Legal Opinion

Forster v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 4, 1943No. 45646Published

1Opinion of the Court

*427The court decided that the plaintiff was entitled to recover, in an opinion per curiam as follows:

Plaintiff sues for the rental and subsistence allowances of a naval officer with a dependent mother, from June 16,1941, to the date of judgment herein. We have found that his mother was in fact dependent upon him. Plaintiff having been on sea duty during the period of the claim, he is entitled to the full rental allowance of an officer of his rank, with a dependent mother. Section 6 of the act of June 10, 1922, as amended by section 2 of the act of May 31, 1924, 43 Stat. 250, was so construed by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mumma v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1943
  2. Ageton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API