Legal Opinion

Amorose v. C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided April 6, 2007No. 06 C 6463, 06 C 6512, 06 C 6629, 06 C 6664PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ELAINE E. BUCKLO, District Judge.

Defendant C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. (“C.H.Robinson”) has filed a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a) to transfer the above captioned cases, each of which raises claims under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., to the district encompassing the branch location where the plaintiffs purportedly worked and where the classification decision at issue in each suit were made. For case number 06 C 6463, defendant contends this is the Northern District of Georgia; for case number 06 C 6512, the Western District of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Margaret E. Coffey v. Van Dorn Iron Works, an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  3. Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railroad Company v. IgoeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1955
  4. In Re: National Presto Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
  5. Vandeveld v. ChristophDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Jaramillo v. DineEquity, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2009
  2. Body Science LLC v. Boston Scientific Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
  3. Craik v. Boeing Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2013
  4. Genocide Victims of Krajina v. L-3 Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2011
  5. Dale v. Deutsche Telekom AGDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2022

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API