Legal Opinion
In Re: National Presto Industries, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided October 21, 2003No. 03-1873PublishedCited by 142 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Circuit Judge.
The Securities and Exchange Commission has sued National Presto Industries in the federal district court in Chicago, charging that Presto has been operating as an unregistered investment company in violation of Section 7(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, 15 U.S.C. §§ 80a-1 et seq. Presto asked the court to transfer the case to the Western District of Wisconsin pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), which authorizes changes of venue “for the convenience of parties and witnesses, in the interest of justice.” The district judge denied the motion, emphasizing that the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Federal Trade Commission v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Renegotiation Board v. Bannercraft Clothing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- In the Matter of Rhone-Poulenc Rorer IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Securities and Exchange Commission v. Savoy Industries, Inc. Appeal of S. Mort ZimmermanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by142 opinions
- In re Volkswagen of America, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- In Re TS Tech USA Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
- In Re: Rolls Royce CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
- In Re EMC CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- In Re Apple, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
137 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.