Legal Opinion
Makransky v. Johnson
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 29, 2016No. 15-CV-1259(JS)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
SEYBERT, District Judge.
William Makransky (“Plaintiff”), a convicted sex offender, filed a visa petition on behalf of his wife, a foreign national. When the petition was denied, Plaintiff sued the director of the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (“USCIS”) and other federal officials asserting violations of his constitutional rights and the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. § 500 et seq. Defendants have moved to dismiss the Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and for failure to state a claim.1 (Docket Entry 12.) For the following…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Barran v. JohnsonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Chirico v. Mendoza JaddouDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023
- Mamedov v. BarrDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023
- Mamedov v. BarrDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023
- Wagafe v. BidenDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025