Legal Opinion
City & County of San Francisco v. PCF Acquisitionco, LLC
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 26, 2015No. A139836PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIGGINS, J.' —
In an eminent domain action, may a condemner’s final pretrial settlement offer, made 20 days before trial and contingent on obtaining approvals from other government entities, be found reasonable under Code of Civil Procedure 1250.410, 1 and thus bar a defendant who rejects it from later recovering its litigation costs? The property owners here, Convenience Retailers and PCF Acquisitionco, LLC (jointly PCF), contend such a contingent offer from the City and County of San Francisco (the City) was unreasonable as a matter of law because it was conditioned on the approval of…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority v. Continental Development Corp.California Supreme Court · 1997
- City of Gardena v. CampCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- County of Kern v. GinnCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
- Edgerly v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Los Angeles County Flood Control District v. MindlinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Reid v. City of San Diego, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Reid v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
- Reid v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018