Legal Opinion
Burke v. Fine
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 18, 2000No. C8-99-1197PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PETERSON, Judge.
In this appeal from a summary judgment, appellant Dr. David G. Fine argues that the district court erred by holding that the noncompete covenant in his employment agreement with respondent Dr. Nicholas Burke was not enforceable after the underlying employment agreement expired. We affirm.
FACTS
Appellant and respondent are cardiologists. Appellant is the sole proprietor of a cardiology practice. In 1995, he hired respondent pursuant to a written employment agreement for a two-year term that began on July 1, 1995. The employment agreement contained a noncompete clause…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Chergosky v. Crosstown Bell, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Employers Mutual Casualty Co. v. A.C.C.T., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Hertz Corp. v. State Farm Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- Storz Broadcasting Co. v. CourtneyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
- Sanz v. RT Aerospace Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Johnson v. Polaris Sales, Inc.District Court, D. Maine · 2003
- Diversified Dynamics Corp. v. Wagner Spray Tech Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Allan Block Corp. v. County Materials Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2008
- Brand Advantage Group, Inc. v. HenshawDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2020
- InterRad Medical, Inc. v. Aquilant LimitedDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.