Legal Opinion

State v. MacE

Utah Supreme Court

Decided July 26, 1996No. 930509PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Chief Justice:

Aaron G. Mace appeals his conviction and sentence for rape and aggravated robbery, both first degree felonies. Mace contends that Utah’s insanity defense, as codified in section 76-2-305 and in other related sections of the Utah Code, violates state and federal constitutional prohibitions against cruel and unusual punishment. We reject Mace’s contentions and affirm his conviction and sentence.

On December 2, 1992, Mace knocked on the door of a woman’s apartment to tell her that someone was tampering with her car. After entering the apartment, Mace began to tell the…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. HoustonUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. LaffertyUtah Supreme Court · 2001
  3. State v. BondUtah Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Washington County Water Conservancy District v. MorganUtah Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. HerreraUtah Supreme Court · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API