Metaullics Systems Co. L.P. v. Molten Metal Equipment Innovations, Inc.

I concur in the principal opinion, but write separately to address matters raised by the dissenting opinion which are not supported by the law or facts in this case. The record shows that the parties received a fair trial and the jury verdict should not be disturbed.

I

Metaullics’ arguments concerning judicial bias in the first assignment of error lack merit for both procedural and substantive reasons. See State v. Davis (1992), 79 Ohio App.3d 450, 607 N.E.2d 543; Lorenc v. Sciborowski (Mar. 16, 1995), Cuyahoga App. No. 66945, unreported, at 7-8,1995 WL 116850 (Porter, J.). As in Lorenc, the…