Electron Corp. v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge RULAND.
This case is before us pursuant to a mandate from our supreme court in Subsequent Injury Fund v. Electron Gory., 817 P.2d 533 (Colo.1991). There, the court vacated our decision in Electron Corp. v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office, 817 P.2d 576 (Colo.App.1991) and directed us to reconsider our analysis in light of its decision in Climax Molybdenum Co. v. Walter, 812 P.2d 1168 (Colo.1991). In accordance with that latter holding, we affirm the order of the Industrial Claim Appeals Panel.
Claimant was exposed to significant amounts of silica dust and asbestos fibers during…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Climax Molybdenum Co. v. WalterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Orsinger Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- People v. RosburgSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- Bath v. Colorado Department of Revenue, Motor Vehicle DivisionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Union Carbide Corp. v. Industrial CommissionSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Waddell v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1998
- Robbins Flower Shop v. CineaColorado Court of Appeals · 1995
- Waddell v. Industrial Claim Appeals OfficeColorado Court of Appeals · 1998