Legal Opinion

Orsinger Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. Department of Highways

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 22, 1988No. 86SA215PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

QUINN, Chief Justice.

Orsinger Outdoor Advertising, Inc. (Or-singer) appeals from a district court judgment upholding the decision of the Department of Highways (department) denying Orsinger’s applications for sign permits because the signs did not comply with the spacing requirements of the Roadside Advertising Regulations (regulations), 2 Colo. Code Regs. § 601-3 (1983), promulgated by the department pursuant to the Outdoor Advertising Act, §§ 43-1-401 to -420, 17 C.R.S. (1984 and 1987 Supp.). 1 The issues on this appeal range over a broad area. Orsinger challenges the Outdoor Advertising…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Department of Health v. DonahueSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  4. Appalachian Power Company v. Russell E. Train, as Administrator Environmental Protection Agency, Alabama Power Company, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1976
  5. Elizondo v. STATE, DEPT. OF REVENUE, ETC.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1977

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Committee for Better Health Care for All Colorado Citizens v. MeyerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  2. Zamarripa v. Q & T Food Stores, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1997
  3. National Advertising Co. v. Department of HighwaysSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  4. Colorado Dog Fanciers, Inc. v. City & County of Denver Ex Rel. City CouncilSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  5. Widder v. Durango School District No. 9-RSupreme Court of Colorado · 2004

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API