Bangs v. Midland Loan & Finance Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Per curiam
This was an action to cancel and set aside as void a conditional sales contract on the ground that it was usurious. The action was tried to the court without a jury. Findings and conclusions were made in favor of plaintiff, and from an order denying defendants’ motions for amended findings or for a new trial these appeals were taken.
Plaintiff, on September 11, 1934, purchased an automobile from the Keating-Hill Company in Minneapolis and, for the balance of the purchase price then unpaid, executed a conditional sales contract to that company. Thereafter the Heating-Hill Company assigned the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Stein v. SwensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rathbun v. WT Grant CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Dunn v. Midland Loan Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- Bell v. Idaho Finance Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1953
- Midland Loan Finance Co. v. LorentzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- Critchfield v. MahoneyCuyahoga County Municipal Court · 1945