Legal Opinion

Bangs v. Midland Loan & Finance Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 18, 1937No. Nos. 31,224, 31,239PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

This was an action to cancel and set aside as void a conditional sales contract on the ground that it was usurious. The action was tried to the court without a jury. Findings and conclusions were made in favor of plaintiff, and from an order denying defendants’ motions for amended findings or for a new trial these appeals were taken.

Plaintiff, on September 11, 1934, purchased an automobile from the Keating-Hill Company in Minneapolis and, for the balance of the purchase price then unpaid, executed a conditional sales contract to that company. Thereafter the Heating-Hill Company assigned the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Stein v. SwensenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rathbun v. WT Grant CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
  2. Dunn v. Midland Loan Finance Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
  3. Bell v. Idaho Finance Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1953
  4. Midland Loan Finance Co. v. LorentzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  5. Critchfield v. MahoneyCuyahoga County Municipal Court · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API