Legal Opinion
Mitchell v. Muhammed
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 25, 2000PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In a family offense proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the appeal is from an order of the Family Court, Westchester County (Cooney, J.), dated May 11, 1998, which granted the petitioner an order of protection against the respondent until May 11, 2001.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
In an order of protection made pursuant to Family Court Act article 8, the court may direct either party to observe reasonable conditions of behavior, so long as those conditions advance the purpose of “attempting to stop the violence, end the family disruption…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Friederwitzer v. FriederwitzerNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- Leffingwell v. LeffingwellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Davis v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Jane Y. v. Joseph Y.New York City Family Court · 1984
3Cited by6 opinions
- Matter of Monos v. MonosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Fiore v. FioreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Harrington v. HarringtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Kristine Z. v. Anthony C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Gonzalez v. AcostaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.